Issue - meetings

Woodberry Grove, Finsbury Park, London, N4 1SN

Meeting: 07/01/2009 - Planning Sub-Committee (Item 11)

11 Skinners Academy, Woodberry Grove, Finsbury Park, London, N4 1SN pdf icon PDF 157 KB

Additional documents:

Decision:

RESOLVED that:-

 

Notwithstanding boundary treatment, planning permission be GRANTED, subject to conditions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minutes:

Erection of a three storey sixth form entry academy with associated landscaping, to include a sports hall, two multi-use games areas and forty two parking spaces.

 

POST-SUBMISSION REVISIONS:  Changes to elevational design of all parts of the proposal, including main entrance; changes to proposed landscaping in front of all three entrances; change to location of disabled parking spaces; change to position of boundary by New River; change of perimeter fence design and position to ‘indicative’; minor changes to footprint of the building (in particular the north-eastern elevation).

 

11.1  The Planning Officer introduced the report, as set out in the agenda.  He referred to the addendum and informed the Sub-Committee that in relation to paragraph 4.6.1, Thames Water had sent a further response stating that the existing water supply infrastructure had insufficient capacity to meet the additional demands for the proposed development.  An additional condition was recommended to address this issue.  He added that the comments previously submitted by the Urban Design and Conservation Team had also been amended, which were detailed within the addendum.

 

11.2  Councillor Middleton expressed concerns regarding the scheme, on behalf of residents, her comments are summarised as follows:

 

§  Not opposed to the scheme.

§  Felt that the report did not reflect the noise and disturbance generated during the construction of the development and also the increased traffic generated down Woodberry Grove.

§  Felt that some type of compensation should be given to local residents for the disturbance caused and that this should be given in writing.

 

11.3  Peter Naughton spoke in support of the scheme with concerns, his comments are summarised as follows:

 

§  The scheme is welcomed by local residents as many of them have to go outside of the borough for school.

§  Concerned with the increased level of traffic especially towards the end of Woodberry Grove, which is already subject to heavy construction traffic with the substation.

§  Need for proper supervision between Green Lanes and the site during construction of the development.

 

11.4  In response to comments raised the applicant explained that a traffic management plan had been produced and that no construction vehicles would be permitted along the elevation of the development between Green Lanes and the end of Woodberry Grove.  The level of noise generated would also be monitored on a regular basis.

 

11.5  The Principal Solicitor clarified the point raised by Councillor Middleton regarding compensation.  She explained that the issue of compensation was not under the remit of the Sub-Committee and that the issue surrounding construction and the management plan was for consideration by the Sub-Committee.

 

11.6  Councillor Hanson referred to the cycle parking as she believed that 141 spaces was not enough for the size of the development.  In response, the agent explained that they expected the majority of students to walk to the school and that the number of spaces had been decided in consultation with the school and education authority.

 

11.7  In response to questions from the Chair the architect confirmed the ecological elements of  ...  view the full minutes text for item 11